This is dessert. It's a processed food, and I won't call a jar of milk and sugar healthy. Nobody should.
It is also one of the simplest processed foods you can buy: milk and sugar cooked for hours, plus a short list of helpers. This year, during an FDA visit to our facility, the ask came through: update the labels. The updated list names every ingredient in full legal language — and legal language is not kind. "Interesterified soybean oil." "Distilled monoglycerides." I read the new list and I didn't like looking at it.
So before printing it, I stopped and had every single ingredient researched properly. Regulatory opinions from the FDA, the European Food Safety Authority and the World Health Organization first, then independent studies with public funding. One rule ran through all of it: a study paid for by the people who sell the ingredient doesn't count in its favor.
Here is what came back. All of it, including the parts that don't help me.
The science isn't finished on everything in here, and where it isn't, I say so.
The label, as it prints
The legal ingredient statement, unedited.
Ingredients
SUGAR, WATER, NONFAT DRY MILK, INTERESTERIFIED SOYBEAN OIL, SODIUM BICARBONATE, AGAR-AGAR, POTASSIUM SORBATE (A PRESERVATIVE), DISTILLED MONOGLYCERIDES, LACTASE (GLYCEROL, β-GALACTOSIDASE, POTASSIUM CHLORIDE), NATURAL VANILLA FLAVOR (CANE SUGAR, ACACIA GUM, NATURAL FLAVOR, VANILLA BEAN EXTRACTIVES), LACTOSE.
On the front of the pail: CONTAINS MILK · CONTAINS SOY.
The first four lines are the food: sugar, water, milk and a fat. Everything after them — every name that looks alarming — is the small stuff, and I've printed how small it is on the pail itself.
How little of it there is
Ingredient by ingredient. The pail carries the total; this is what's behind it.
| Ingredient | How much | What it does |
|---|---|---|
| Sodium bicarbonate | < 0.1% | baking soda; controls acidity in the cook |
| Agar-agar | < 0.1% | a seaweed; body and texture |
| Potassium sorbate | < 0.1% | stops yeast and mold |
| Distilled monoglycerides | < 0.1% | a fat; keeps the milk from boiling over |
| Lactase | < 0.02% | an enzyme; keeps it from turning gritty |
| Natural vanilla flavor | < 0.02% | the vanilla |
| Lactose | trace | milk sugar |
| All of them together | < 0.5% | less than an ounce in this eleven-pound pail |
The list, in plain words
Every ingredient on the label, in the order it prints.
Sugar
First ingredient by weight, and the only thing on this list that really matters to your health. I'll get to it.
Water
Tap water. The same water the city drinks — nothing fancier than that.
Nonfat dry milk
Milk with the fat taken out and the water dried off. My abuela made dulce de leche by boiling down fresh whole milk in an open pot for hours. Mine starts from milk powder and water instead: powder doesn't sour on its way to the kettle, doesn't change with the season, and makes every batch come out the same. Add the water back — that's milk.
Interesterified soybean oil
Soybean oil rearranged so it stays solid at room temperature without being hydrogenated. It is in there because the milk I start from has no fat left in it, so the fat gets added back — as a solid vegetable fat that holds up the way a bakery needs it to: through an oven, and through weeks of an open pail at room temperature. Because it comes from soy, the label says CONTAINS SOY. That is the FDA's rule and I follow it to the letter. This is the one I have the most to say about, further down.
Sodium bicarbonate · less than 0.1%
"Sodium bicarbonate" may be the scariest-sounding name on this list. It's baking soda — a mined mineral, the same one in your kitchen. It controls the acidity of the milk while it cooks; that is its whole job in the kettle. And it is the one ingredient on this list that was also in my abuela's pot.
Agar-agar · less than 0.1%
Seaweed — red algae, cooked in hot water, filtered, and dried. Some agar gets an alkaline wash before the cooking; no solvents are involved either way. As industrial ingredients go, this is about as close to "just a plant" as it gets, and it is permitted in USDA certified-organic food. It gives the dulce de leche its body and keeps it from weeping liquid on the shelf.
Potassium sorbate · less than 0.1%
A preservative — first found in rowan berries. It stops yeast and mold. Your body treats it like a fatty acid: it burns most of it and breathes it out as carbon dioxide within a couple of hours.
Distilled monoglycerides · less than 0.1%
Chemically this is a fat — glycerol with fatty acids attached, which is what every fat in your kitchen is, just with more of them on each molecule. Your gut digests it with the same enzyme, into the same two pieces, as any other fat you eat. Its job in my product is simple and physical: the vat foams when the milk cooks, and this keeps it from boiling over. I have more to say about this one below.
Lactase · less than 0.02%
The enzyme in Lactaid, brewed from a dairy yeast. It splits milk sugar into two simpler sugars so the dulce de leche doesn't turn gritty after a few months on a shelf — and then the cooking destroys it. It is on the label because US law lists what goes into a food, not what survives the process: the same reason you see baking soda there when nearly all of it has reacted away by the time the batch leaves the kettle.
Natural vanilla flavor · less than 0.02%
Vanilla flavor carried on cane sugar and gum arabic. Straight up: most of what is doing the flavoring here is not vanilla bean. US law lists the parts of a compound ingredient heaviest first, and on mine "natural flavor" comes before "vanilla bean extractives." The bean is the smaller part. Real vanilla bean is the truffle of the food world — rare, expensive, and for most of us more myth than pantry. This is how nearly everyone actually gets to taste it. I'd rather tell you that than sell you the myth.
Lactose · trace
Milk sugar, dead last on the list, and a trace. Nobody added it — it came in with the milk, and the lactase just above splits part of it into simpler sugars. What's left is still there, so US law says it goes on the list. On the list it goes.
Why the list is this long
It is not eleven separate decisions. It is one job: taking a recipe that was made in an open pot and eaten the same week, and getting it into an eleven, twenty-two or fifty-five pound pail that a bakery opens and works from for weeks — the label says refrigerate after opening; the recipe has to survive the days when nobody does. Every helper on this list is there because it is the only way I know to do that to my abuela's recipe safely and consistently — same taste, same texture, every batch, for months. The agar supplies the body. The preservative exists because of the open pail. The monoglycerides are there for the boil-over. Take the pail and the weeks away, and most of the list goes with them.
And the pail itself is cooked for about three hours, the way dulce de leche has always been made at home. Hours at a boil leave bacteria very little chance. They leave it just as little chance of improving your diet. That is the plain truth about this processed food: careful, consistent, and dessert.
The two I can't fully clear
I'd rather tell you this than have you find it.
Interesterified soybean oil
No long-term human study has ever been run on this specific fat. Not one. The paper most often quoted against it, from 2007, was funded by the Malaysian Palm Oil Board. Its lead author was employed there, its second author was a graduate student there, its third author sat on the Malaysian Palm Oil Advisory Council — and the fat they compared it against was palm oil, which is the product the board exists to sell. The best independent work I could find is a 2020 systematic review that declared no funding from anyone and found no effect on blood cholesterol. Against that sit two studies from Brazilian public universities that found effects on the livers of rats. Rats aren't people, and a review that finds nothing isn't the same as proof of safety. The truthful word for this fat is unresolved. Not safe, not dangerous. Nobody has done the work.
Texas and Louisiana have both put interesterified soybean oil on a list of ingredients that will require a warning label or a QR code — Texas from January 2027 under Senate Bill 25, Louisiana from January 2028. That is a legislature's judgment, not a scientific finding, and four food-industry trade associations are fighting the Texas law in federal court right now — a judge has blocked enforcement against them while the state appeals. But it is on the list, and I am not going to pretend it isn't.
Distilled monoglycerides
A French study called NutriNet-Santé followed 92,000 adults, on French public money, and found that people who ate more of this class of emulsifier had modestly more cancer. My honest read: distilled monoglycerides are in nearly every packaged baked good on earth, which makes them a very good marker for somebody who eats a lot of packaged food — and the two emulsifiers with the strongest evidence of harm in animal studies showed nothing at all in that same French study, which is what you would expect if the association is the shadow of something else rather than the thing itself. That is my read, and I want to be clear that it is a read. I can't prove it. Neither can they.
The part nobody in my business says out loud
Every additive on that list, all of them together, comes to less than half of one percent of the jar — less than an ounce in an eleven-pound pail. The rest is sugar, milk and the fat. Dulce de leche is about half sugar by weight and always has been.
To reach the European safety limit for potassium sorbate — a limit that already has a hundred-fold margin built into it — you would have to eat 210 grams of this dulce de leche every day for the rest of your life. Those 210 grams carry more than twice the sugar the World Health Organization says a person should eat in a whole day.
The preservative would be the least of your problems. If you are going to worry about this jar, worry about the sugar.
Sugar is a horrible ingredient. At least I say so — and I make it taste better than anyone else does.
This is dessert. It has been dessert since 1988, and it will go on being dessert.
Every study, and who paid for it
The whole evidence base this page rests on. Funding is flagged in both directions — industry and advocacy.
Regulators and consensus bodies
- 21 CFR 184.1505 mono- and diglycerides · 21 CFR 182.3640 potassium sorbate · 21 CFR 184.1115 agar-agar · 21 CFR 184.1388 lactase from Kluyveromyces lactis · 21 CFR 184.1330 acacia gum — US Code of Federal Regulations, current text.
- 21 CFR 101.4 designation of ingredients · 21 CFR 101.100 exemptions from labeling · 21 CFR 101.22 flavorings and chemical preservatives · 21 CFR 169.175–169.182 vanilla standards of identity — US Code of Federal Regulations, current text.
- FDA, Final Determination Regarding Partially Hydrogenated Oils, 80 FR 34650, 17 June 2015.
- FDA, List of Select Chemicals in the Food Supply Under FDA Review, current as of 29 July 2026 — 32 entries; none of my ingredients appears on it.
- European Food Safety Authority re-evaluations: sorbic acid and potassium sorbate (2015, and the 2019 follow-up setting the 11 mg/kg limit) · mono- and diglycerides E471 (2017, infant follow-up 2021) · agar E406 (2016) · acacia gum E414 (2017).
- WHO/FAO Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives — sorbates, WHO Food Additives Series 5 (1973).
- WHO, Saturated fatty acid and trans-fatty acid intake for adults and children, 17 July 2023 — contains no reference to interesterification.
- WHO guideline on free sugars, 2015 · USDA FoodData Central entry 173461, dulce de leche composition.
- Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/1428, contaminant specifications for E471.
- Texas Senate Bill 25 (89R), enrolled text, Health & Safety Code § 431.0815 — interesterified soybean oil is item 21; implementing rules 25 TAC §§ 229.1001–229.1005, finalized 20 February 2026.
- Louisiana Act 463 of 2025, R.S. 40:661–662 — interesterified soybean oil is item 21.
- American Beverage Association et al. v. Paxton, No. 6:25-cv-00566 (W.D. Tex.), preliminary injunction 11 February 2026; state's appeal to the Fifth Circuit filed 5 March 2026, No. 26-50192, pending as of September 2026.
- 7 CFR 205.605, USDA National List — agar and sodium bicarbonate permitted in certified-organic food; sorbate absent; mono- and diglycerides limited to drum drying.
Independent reviews — no industry money
- van Rooijen & Mensink, Nutrients 2020;12(3):615 — 36 human intervention trials on interesterified fats. No external funding, no declared conflicts. Found no effect on fasting blood lipids.
- Lane et al., BMJ 2024;384:e077310 — umbrella review of ultra-processed food, 45 pooled analyses, 9,888,373 participants. "This work was not funded."
- Berry, Nutrition Research Reviews 2009;22(1) — triacylglycerol structure and interesterification.
- Pinto et al., Genetics and Molecular Biology 2025 — systematic review of preservative genotoxicity. No conflicts declared. The strongest signal attaches to sodium benzoate, not sorbate.
- Al-Jubori et al., Biomolecules 2023;13(1):138 — gum arabic clinical trials. No external funding, no conflicts.
Primary studies
- Sellem et al., PLOS Medicine 2024;21(2):e1004338 — emulsifiers and cancer, NutriNet-Santé cohort, 92,000 adults. French Ministry of Health and INSERM. No competing interests. This is the study that counts against my monoglycerides.
- Sellem et al., BMJ 2023;382:e076058 — emulsifiers and cardiovascular disease. E471 is only ever reported pooled with E472, never alone. Nobody should say this study links E471 to heart disease.
- Hall et al., Cell Metabolism 2019 — NIH inpatient randomized crossover, 20 adults, +508 kcal/day on the ultra-processed arm.
- Dicken et al., Nature Medicine 2025 — 50 participants, eight-week arms. Note the published Matters Arising challenging its causal reading.
- Chassaing & Gewirtz, Nature 2015 — the famous emulsifier-and-gut mouse study. It tested carboxymethylcellulose and polysorbate-80 only. Mono- and diglycerides were not tested.
- Chassaing et al., Gastroenterology 2022 — randomized controlled feeding, 16 participants, carboxymethylcellulose as the sole variable.
- Naimi et al., Microbiome 2021;9:66 — 20 emulsifiers tested in vitro. Mono- and diglycerides showed no discernible impact in that run.
- Klein, Révillion & de Jong, Ciência e Agrotecnologia 2010 — β-galactosidase against crystallization in doce de leite; enzyme into cold milk, five hours at 6 °C, hydrolysis 13–41%.
- Rico-Díaz et al., Scientific Reports 2017 — K. lactis β-galactosidase melting temperature, 39.3 °C. This is why the enzyme does not survive the kettle.
- Molognoni et al., Food Chemistry 2016 — 35 commercial dulce de leche samples tested; 67% exceeded the sorbic acid maximum. Mine is a fraction of the limit; see the arithmetic above.
- Mommers et al., British Journal of Cancer 2006 — lactose and ovarian cancer, relative risk 0.93. World Cancer Research Fund UK.
- Miyamoto et al., Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 2018 (UNICAMP) and Lavrador et al., Nutrients 2019 (USP) — interesterified fats in rodents. Brazilian public universities. These are the two that found liver effects.
Flagged — paid for by industry
- IndustrySundram, Karupaiah & Hayes, Nutrition & Metabolism 2007;4:3 — Malaysian Palm Oil Board funded; two authors employed there, a third on its advisory council; the comparator was the sponsor's own palm oil. The most-cited paper against interesterified fat. Under my rule it does not count in anyone's favor — and I have used it against the people who paid for it.
- IndustryDestaillats, Moulin & Bezelgues, Nutrition & Metabolism 2007;4:10 — Nestlé Research Center. The methodological rebuttal to Sundram. Flagged for the same reason, pointing the other way.
- IndustryMeijer & Weststrate, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1997 — the cleanest long human test of interesterified versus non-interesterified fat, and it found nothing. Both authors, Unilever Research Laboratory.
- IndustryMensink et al., Advances in Nutrition 2016 — ILSI North America workshop report; authors disclose Malaysian Palm Oil Board and ADM income. Worth reading precisely because an industry-funded body conceding open questions tells you more than one claiming safety.
- IndustryJung et al., Food and Chemical Toxicology 1992 — the most-quoted "sorbate is not genotoxic" paper. Hoechst AG, a sorbate manufacturer.
Flagged — paid for by advocacy
- AdvocacyNeltner et al., JAMA Internal Medicine 2013 (Pew) and Matouskova et al., Environmental Health 2023 (Environmental Defense Fund) — conflict-of-interest analyses of the GRAS system. Advocacy-funded and disclosed; the method is checkable document review.
- AdvocacyWeston A. Price Foundation and Processed-Free America on mono- and diglycerides as "hidden trans fats" — not peer-reviewed and the numbers are unsourced. The directional point about a labeling gap is real. Named here so I can dismiss it rather than pretend it doesn't exist.
- AdvocacyNRDC, Generally Recognized as Secret (2014) — cited in both directions: it makes the strongest case against the GRAS system, and it also states that the flavor industry has publicly identified its GRAS chemicals since 1963.
I make dulce de leche for a living, and I care about you and the people you serve — more than I care about the sale.
As Carlos Solari once said: "Si no hay amor que no haya nada entonces."
Jorge Marseillan
President & Owner · Indalco Foods Corp
Dulce de Leche del Campo · September 2026 · info@indalcofoods.com